<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OCS2009-DBUpgrade.msi with a 32-bit SQL Server Back-End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much.  Considering that OCS 2007 R2  takes 980MB would it be too much to ask to include your most illuminating infomraiton on Client Tools rather than the pitiful message that the upgrader displays?  Thank you very much for taking the time to post this help.    (besides is it just me but -- we run OCS on SQL 2008 having to install SQL 05 tools seems a little goofy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much.  Considering that OCS 2007 R2  takes 980MB would it be too much to ask to include your most illuminating infomraiton on Client Tools rather than the pitiful message that the upgrader displays?  Thank you very much for taking the time to post this help.    (besides is it just me but &#8212; we run OCS on SQL 2008 having to install SQL 05 tools seems a little goofy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gastro</title>
		<link>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Gastro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/ocs2009-dbupgrademsi-with-a-32-bit-sql-server-back-end/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This article helped me a lot. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Had to start the OCS2009-DBUpgrade.msi via an elevated cmd prompt to upgrade our OCS &lt;b&gt;Standard&lt;/b&gt; Pool.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Starting the Update via Windows Explorer always resulted in an Error.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article helped me a lot. Thanks!</p>

<p>Had to start the OCS2009-DBUpgrade.msi via an elevated cmd prompt to upgrade our OCS <b>Standard</b> Pool.</p>

<p>Starting the Update via Windows Explorer always resulted in an Error.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
