<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Confused Amused &#187; at&amp;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confusedamused.com/tags/att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confusedamused.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s to Captain Obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/heres-to-captain-obvious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/heres-to-captain-obvious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Pacyk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confusedamused.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig Moffet on AT&#38;T&#8217;s negative press concerning the lack of MMS and tethering feature support so far:
Apple has radically tilted the strategic playing field away from the network operator in favor of the device manufacturer. Remarkably, Apple has so thoroughly stolen the customer relationship &#8211; who would argue that Apple iPhone customers’ first affinity is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>Craig Moffet on AT&amp;T&#8217;s negative press concerning the lack of MMS and tethering feature support so far:
<blockquote><p>Apple has radically tilted the strategic playing field away from the network operator in favor of the device manufacturer. Remarkably, Apple has so thoroughly stolen the customer relationship &#8211; who would argue that Apple iPhone customers’ first affinity is to the device rather than to the network &#8211; that the network is not only irrelevant, it is rather a source of derision.</p></blockquote></p>

<p>I think you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find someone who actually switched to AT&#038;T because their service or rate plans were actually a draw from another carrier. You expect the service to be about the same across any carrier and you make your choice based on either a rate plan or a device you want. I&#8217;m one of the people who switched to AT&#038;T solely for the iPhone when the 3G came out. There was never anything about AT&#038;T that made me want to use them and I was perfectly content using an unlocked device on T-Mobile until there was actually a limitation on speed because of my carrier. </p>

<p>Kudos to Apple to actually pushing out a phone that tries to make AT&#038;T improve their network and feature set on a reasonable schedule. As it is, we&#8217;re still well behind the rest of the world.</p>

<p>Via <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/07/13/for-att-is-the-apple-iphone-a-blessing-or-a-curse/">Tech Trader Daily</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/heres-to-captain-obvious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

